To subscribe, advertise or contribute articles to www.nzmanufacturer.co.nz contact publisher@xtra.co.nz
  • Home
  • Latest News
    • Business News
    • Developments
    • Product News
    • Manufacturing Technology
    • Analysis
    • Innovators
    • Energy
    • Calendar
    • Editorial
  • About the Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe to the Magazine
NZ Manufacturer - Success Through Innovation
Success Through Innovation
  • Home
  • AI
  • Analysis
  • Business News
  • Climate Change
  • Covid-19
  • Cyber Security
  • Developments
  • Energy
  • Events
  • SouthMACH 2025
  • Innovators
  • Magazine
  • Manufacturing Technology
  • Industry 4.0
  • Product News
  • Productivity
  • Profiles
  • Smart Manufacturing Today
  • Sustainability
  • The Creative Class
  • Webinars

News Ticker

How manufacturers can prepare for the ESPR
Tech isn’t the Hero, it’s the plucky sidekick
Finding Your True Competitive Edge: A Guide for Manufacturers
Fixing manufacturing’s billion-dollar harm problem
Steel awards showcase local industry’s expertise and sophistication
Aotearoa’s Industry 4.0 journey
5S – Not That Old Chestnut
Scott Aylett, SEA Electrical a winner

‘Tech bro’ culture stifling startup sector

 

Dr Janine Swail.

 

 

You might have heard the term ‘tech bro’ – a shorthand for the hypermasculine culture synonymous with the startup world. But while it’s often associated with Silicon Valley, that same culture is alive and well in New Zealand’s innovation scene too, say researchers Professor Anne de Bruin and Dr Janine Swail.

Entrepreneurial ecosystems: the networks, organisations, and funding systems that support startup ventures, might seem open to all. But they’re far from gender neutral, the researchers say.

“The strong association of masculine traits with entrepreneurship persists, hindering gender equity,” says de Bruin.

In a new paper, de Bruin and Swail examine how gender dynamics shape startup ecosystems, and how feminist theories can be used to make them more inclusive and equitable.

“If you think about Auckland’s startup sector, it’s still pretty ‘tech bro’,” says Swail. “We need to rethink what it means to be inclusive in entrepreneurship.”

She says this starts with challenging the norms that shape entrepreneurial culture – norms that can make women and non-binary people feel unwelcome.

“Imagine you’re a female deep-tech entrepreneur looking for a lab or an accelerator programme,” says Swail. “You walk into a space that feels overwhelmingly masculine; in-jokes, blokey language, a boys club. It can be difficult to feel like you belong, let alone thrive.”

One of the biggest barriers? Unacknowledged gender bias baked into the structures and language of entrepreneurship. De Bruin points to New Zealand’s finance ecosystem, where most venture capitalists are men.

“The way people communicate and operate in that world is often coded in a very masculine way. Language matters, and when we start to unpack it, we see how women and others are often excluded, even unintentionally.”

If New Zealand wants to develop a genuinely diverse startup sector, we need to question who it’s built for, and who’s being left out.

Feminist theories argue for a shift from accepting the status quo to actively creating gender-equitable ecosystems.

One international organisation the researchers point to doing just that is Coralus (originally SheEO). Formerly led in New Zealand by Dame Theresa Gattung, Coralus was launched in Canada in 2015 as an experiment in more equitable funding for women and nonbinary people. Since then, it has flipped the traditional funding model favouring male-led ventures and distributed nearly $19 million to more than 190 female- and non-binary-led ventures using a collective decision-making model.

“By challenging traditional funding structures, Coralus reimagines what an entrepreneurial ecosystem can look like,” says Swail. “Even the name change – from SheEO to Coralus – reflects a broader, more inclusive vision.”

If New Zealand wants to develop a genuinely diverse startup sector, we need to question who it’s built for, and who’s being left out, says de Bruin. “We can create new pathways and build a future for entrepreneurship that’s more inclusive, more equitable, and ultimately, more innovative.”

 

Share this:

Related Posts

FB_caliber-690x477

Analysis /

Engineering capacity when and where you need it

Craig Renney

Business News /

Unemployment data shows real weakness behind the headline rate

John Berry 3

Developments /

Chemz: Built on experience, Powered by Kiwi loyalty

‹ Hydrogen electric flight prepares for lift off in New Zealand › Manufacturing fuels the present – SouthMACH 2025 is on soon

12th May 2025

Categories

  • AI
  • Analysis
  • AusTech
  • Business Books
  • Business News
  • Calendar
  • Case Studies
  • Climate Change
  • Covid-19
  • Cyber Security
  • DESIGN
  • Developments
  • Editorial
  • EMEX 2014
  • EMEX 2016
  • EMEX 2018
  • EMEX 2024
  • ENERGY
  • Events
  • FOOD
  • Industry 4.0
  • Innovators
  • LEAN MANUFACTURING
  • Magazine
  • Manufacturing Technology
  • Product News
  • Productivity
  • Profiles
  • Rear View
  • Recent News
  • Recent News
  • Regional Manufacturing
  • Smart Manufacturing Today
  • Solidtech
  • SouthMACH 2015
  • SouthMACH 2019
  • Sustainability
  • The Circular Economy
  • The Creative Class
  • The Daily News
  • Uncategorized
  • Webinars

Archives

Back to Top

  • Home
  • AI
  • Analysis
  • Business News
  • Climate Change
  • Covid-19
  • Cyber Security
  • Developments
  • Energy
  • Events
  • SouthMACH 2025
  • Innovators
  • Magazine
  • Manufacturing Technology
  • Industry 4.0
  • Product News
  • Productivity
  • Profiles
  • Smart Manufacturing Today
  • Sustainability
  • The Creative Class
  • Webinars

To subscribe, advertise or contribute articles to nzmanufacturer.co.nz contact publisher@xtra.co.nz

(c) NZ Manufacturer, 2025