doug

About doug

Posts by Doug Green:

Holidays Act reform – let’s get it done once and done right

By EMA Head of Advocacy and Strategy Alan McDonald It’s hard to think of a piece of legislation that has needed reform for as long as the Holidays Act. Successive governments have been aware of longstanding concerns over the Act among workers, employers and payroll providers alike and promised to fix the issues. But they have also largely failed to deliver any meaningful change. Businesses have long been calling for the Holidays Act to be scrapped and rewritten, saying it’s too complicated and is costing businesses time and money. Unfortunately, the approach to addressing those issues has been largely to ignore the main problems and tinker with existing legislation, adding further complexity. The main issue for many employers was how the Act calculates annual leave, public holidays, sick days, and bereavement leave. With the rise of different styles of work, it was challenging to accurately figure out how much workers were owed. The previous government had a go at reforming the legislation, and in March 2020, Cabinet endorsed in full the 22 recommendations for improvements to the Act made by a tripartite Holidays Act Taskforce. However, the draft bill was far too complicated and didn’t see the light of day. Now, the coalition government is attempting to reform the legislation and an exposure draft on the Holidays Act Bill was released for targeted consultation in September. The EMA was one of the organisations tapped to review the exposure draft and provide feedback. We’ve worked with select members of the EMA to make sure we canvassed a range of opinions across the business community. We also recently tested out thinking with around 500 members on a webinar and they largely agreed with the direction of our approach as it provides something efficient and simple for employers to operate. We have been under a non-disclosure agreement as […]

Can we be world-class leaders?

From October issue NZ Manufacturer magazine www.nzmanufacturer.co.nz -Ian Walsh, Partner, Argon and Co Recently, I had the opportunity to work with business leaders on New Zealand’s productivity performance and, how it compares to key trading nations and OECD members. Over the past 50 years, New Zealand’s ranking has fallen from being in the top five to the bottom five. It’s a tough reality, but more interestingly, the discussion centred around why Scandinavian countries and Ireland excel while we continue to struggle. Many attribute New Zealand’s lagging performance to factors like distance to market, limited access to capital, and the small size of our domestic markets. Undoubtedly these do play a role, but they are largely beyond a business’s control. No matter how efficient we become, we still face the challenge of shipping goods across the globe. If we focus on these external factors alone, we will continue to run the risk of overlooking the most crucial areas where we can improve – leadership and people management. Studies show that New Zealand consistently underperforms in these areas compared to other OECD nations, and this is not a recent development. Over the last 40 years, other countries have systematically invested in cultivating great leaders, while New Zealand seems to have fallen into five fatal assumptions about leadership. The Five Fatal Assumptions About Leadership in New Zealand: Promoting the best operator to leader will work out Many workplaces fall into the trap of promoting the best operator to leadership roles. While they are often respected for their technical skills, they may lack the ability to manage people effectively. This can result in the loss of a great operator and sometimes even a demotivated team. Leadership requires a different skill set—one that needs to be developed, not assumed. Leaders are born, not made The […]

Winston Peters’ $100 billion infrastructure fund is the right idea. Politics-as-usual is the problem

-Timothy Wech, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau New Zealand’s infrastructure woes are a constant political pain point. From ageing water systems to congested roads and assets increasingly threatened by climate change, the country faces mammoth upgrading and future-proofing challenges. Enter Winston Peters and NZ First with a surprise proposal for a NZ$100 billion “Future Fund” dedicated to infrastructure investment. Sounds promising – but the proposal’s success will hinge on getting the details right and, more importantly, getting the politics out of infrastructure planning. Unveiled at NZ First’s annual convention last weekend, the idea bears striking similarities to challenges previously highlighted by urban planning and infrastructure experts. The country currently has an estimated infrastructure deficit of over $100 billion which aligns eerily with the scale of Peters’ proposed fund. The Future Fund proposal sounds impressive on paper. Ring-fenced from political meddling and focused on national interests, it’s billed as a silver bullet for infrastructure funding problems. Peters claims he’s taken a page from the Singapore and Ireland playbooks – potentially breaking New Zealand’s habit of treating big infrastructure projects like they’re part of a three-year plan. Long-term savings As always, the devil is in the details – and the Future Fund is light on them. How exactly would this fund be financed ? How would projects be selected and prioritised? And, crucially, how would it be insulated from the political interference it claims to avoid? The potential benefits are significant.Research suggests that a stable, long-term approach to infrastructure investment and better utilisation of existing assets could unlock substantial savings – potentially up to 40% of total project costs. A well-managed $100 billion fund could provide the certainty and consistency needed to achieve these efficiencies. The scale of the fund also aligns with the urgent need for […]

We need to pay attention to completely natural, consumer quality-verified, unprocessed food

-Phyllis Tichinin, soil scientist, founder of True Health Ltd The health narrative is increasingly moving away from processed food, especially ultra-processed foods (UPFs). More emphasis is being put on vitamin and mineral, antioxidant and polyphenol content, also called nutrient density or ORAC. Consumers are becoming concerned about pesticides and packaging chemicals in what they eat. They are looking for food that fully nourishes and heals cells. Ultra-processed items are receiving bad press and labelled as the cause of chronic disease. In America, ninety three percent of Americans have some form of inflammatory chronic disease: cancer, diabetes, fatty liver, Alzheimer’s, allergies, etc. More than half of the population is obese. Seventy-seven percent of young men are unfit for military service. These figures are mirrored in health statistics worldwide. While sedentary screen time, air and water toxins, and stress are implicated, Influential functional medicine doctors and health celebrities are placing the majority of the blame on consumption of processed food. (Check out Dr Casey Means interviews on the Web or Spotify) Our NZ consumption of UPFs is only slightly lower than in the USA and the UK – around 50%, even for children under 5. This global trend has implications for NZ’s food and packaging industries. Most of the food we export is minimally processed, compared to the ultra-processed foods like packaged snacks, desserts, energy bars, etc. We are presently well positioned with a reputation for natural quality, but in most food categories Italy and France have international reputations superior to ours. We can’t cruise on our laurels in this space and we certainly can’t afford to lose any ground. Food wrapping and containers that preserve vitamins, minerals and flavour components without the use of any chemical, heavy metal, or plastic need to be a focus of innovation. Hand in hand […]

The only way is up: how Gallagher Security’s vertically integrated manufacturing model delivers

Global security manufacturer, Gallagher Security has a proud history of delivering its solutions to the world with uninterrupted movement and the assurance they can ship 95% of purchase orders the next day, worldwide. On the eve of World Manufacturing Day on October 4, Gallagher, a frequent award-winner for its manufacturing prowess, acknowledges its vertically integrated manufacturing and engineering capabilities which are backed by more than 86 years of entrepreneurial spirit. Gallagher Security Chief Executive, Mark Junge says, “Because our solutions are designed, engineered, manufactured, and distributed from our head office site in Hamilton, New Zealand, we have complete oversight of manufacturing and distribution, ensuring we maintain quality, and can quickly and easily make changes, invest in raw materials, and implement strategies to ensure continued availability.” With control over the full supply chain, Gallagher can rapidly respond to emerging challenges resulting in shorter lead times, guaranteed quality, full visibility, and the ability to deliver on demand. Such was the case with events of recent years which hit manufacturers around the world hard. The Covid-19 pandemic and associated supply chain and shipping complications pushed Gallagher to re-engineer its products with parts they could access to ensure continued supply. It’s this ability to pivot and their commitment to relentless innovation that minimises the risk of third-party limitations and global risks to people and organisations,’ echoing their customer centric approach and putting people at the heart of everything they do. And the world is watching. In 2023 alone, Gallagher took home five manufacturing awards across Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom at the Australian Security Industry Awards, US, and UK OSPAs (Outstanding Security Performance Award), Security and Fire Matters and Fire and Security Matters awards, respectively. Already in 2024, Gallagher has been awarded a further three Manufacturing awards at the Fire […]

Northland focus: Fiona Bycroft, CEO, Naut

Catherine Lye, CEO of Advanced Manufacturing Aotearoa (AMA) on a recent business trip to Northland, suggested a focus on the movers and shakers and innovators up there. Fiona Bycroft of Naut gets the ball rolling… Fiona Bycroft, CEO, Naut (left) What does Naut specialise in? Naut enables customers to head out on the ocean or lakes, have an amazing day doing everything they usually would, and sometimes more, and return home leaving nothing but wake! We do this by providing electric propulsion systems that fit into the boat of the users choice with the final drive of the users choice, be that stern drive, jet unit, or the Naut outboard. A key difference between a Naut system and a conventional system is the reduction of noise, fumes and pollution and higher reliability. A key difference between the Naut system and other electric systems is the power – the Naut system is 350hp+ and can easily get a boat planing. How is Naut finding current business conditions? Naut has technology that is ready to go to market. Like any new tech, it needs those early adopters to come on board to demonstrate the technology in different sectors and use cases. Naut is excited about where the conversations are going with these early adopters, so watch this space (or maybe I should say watch the waterways near you) Are there export opportunities for your products? Absolutely! We are keen to see more systems sold to NZ based individuals or companies first, and then Australia and USA are natural next markets. However we have already received interest from a number of other countries, and are always open to talking to either boat builders or boat users from around the globe. How easy is it to find the right staff members? Because we are […]

Stop calling workplace safety failures ‘accidents’

By Paul Jarvie, EMA Manager of Employment Relations & Safety With the Government signalling that significant reform of our workplace health and safety regulations are on the way, it’s time to look at the language we use around preventable harms. For too long, ‘accident’ has been a blanket term that absolves responsibility. Whether at home, on the road, or in our workplaces, we’ve grown accustomed to shrugging off incidents as ‘accidents’. But are they truly random acts beyond our control, or is there more to the story? When we label something an ‘accident’, we imply innocence and inevitability. It’s a linguistic shrug that suggests nothing could have been done differently. But the reality, backed by extensive research, paints a different picture. Insurance companies that provide cover for ‘accidental damage’ base their premiums entirely on historical data of such events. They know these events will happen, how many, when and how. The premium setting process uses vast databases to ensure the number of claims do not exceed their premium income – that’s how they remain in business. It’s a similar system to ACC for injury claims. In 2023, ACC handled nearly 200,000 workplace claims, with many stemming from repeat incidents that were likely to have been identified in companies’ hazard registers. As such, they were neither unknown nor unforeseen. This data underscores the need for a more nuanced approach in our safety lexicon. In workplaces, terms like ‘incident’ or ‘near miss’ are often used interchangeably with ‘accident’. Yet, these terms don’t adequately capture the essence of what really happened: a failure in systems, procedures or human judgement that resulted in harm or damage. Take aviation, where research from the Pilot Institute found that pilot error accounted for 69.1% of plane crashes, with 17.2% due to mechanical issues and 13% of unknown […]

How your business can benefit from the circular economy

From September issue of NZ Manufacturer www.nzmanufacturer.co.nz Small Business and Manufacturing Minister Andrew Bayly, along with Climate Change Minister Simon Watts, introduced a new MBIE report showing circular opportunities for the manufacturing sector. “Manufacturing is a sleeping giant for New Zealand’s economy; with the right tools and support, manufacturing has the potential to supercharge our economic growth,” Bayly said. “The manufacturing sector accounts for 10 per cent of GDP, 60 per cent of our exports, and employs 230,000 people.” Increasing demand for low-carbon-manufactured goods “Globally there is increasing demand for low-carbon manufactured products. Our agile and innovative manufacturers with their strong green reputation and access to relatively low-carbon electricity are well positioned to take advantage of this demand,” he added. Watts emphasises that the manufacturing sector is already heading in the right direction and is supporting New Zealand in meeting its climate change targets. However, there is still more to be done. “That’s why we are providing manufacturers with information to support them to adapt their business to be less carbon-intensive, with the launch of a new online toolbox, report and dataset.” Circular economy critical for future of manufacturing The circular economy is critical component of modern manufacturing. Adopting circular economy principles can help you to significantly reduce costs while making your business more sustainable. The circular economy (CE) is a concept that changes how we produce and consume goods. It uses systems thinking to design out waste and pollution, keep products and materials in use and regenerate natural systems. CE moves us away from the current ‘linear’ model of producing and consuming goods and services: ‘take-make-dispose’. It has economic, environmental and social benefits. It is also closely linked to the Bioeconomy, which uses renewable biological resources to produce food, products, and energy. […]

Mackwell & Co. – Empowering energy sovereignty with advanced steam engines

Mackwell & Co. of Christchurch was established in 2016 by Founder Sam Mackwell. The company’s purpose is to “empower energy sovereignty” with a focus on energy resilience and fossil-fuel-free transport. Mackwell realised the two concepts needed to address this are the use of accessible and low value biomass as fuel, and a technology that can safely and cleanly convert this to useful work without relying on extensive infrastructure. The Mackwell A35 features a unique biomass fired water tube boiler that is compact and responsive enough for use in transport as well fixed shaft power or electricity generation. The A35 traction engine is designed for horticultural and small farm towing up to seven tonnes at 40 km/h, and the same boiler and engine will be produced as a 26kW generator set offering up to 180kW of heat. Once this concept is proven in the market the design will be scaled to 600kW for industrial and marine use. Mackwell & Co. technology has shown to have a number of other applications. Earlier this year Mackwell partnered with Biocare Pty Ltd. to design and manufacture four large combustion chambers for a project in Kangaroo island which is set to be one of the largest biochar projects globally. Discussions are now underway with New Zealand forestry operators to use large steam engines to directly drive equipment such as disc chippers. The A35 has attracted five pre-orders for businesses including portable sawmills and essential oils distillation. Customers can expect more than 35% in overall cost savings where replacing diesel engines, and a 96% reduction in CO2 emissions. Small engines are suitable for manual fueling, and larger applications will require a mechanical feed system to maintain the 2.5kg/kWh input requirement. Mackwell engines are of additional value where heat is needed, such as hydronic […]

Paying a ‘unique’ price: Why it can pay to be the same

-Frank Phillips, Managing Director, Fulcrum The Hook “But we’re unique, no one else takes bespoke orders that morning, processes and ships them that afternoon.” “Not even your competitors?” “Yes, they do….but they are much bigger and can afford to develop systems that are perfect for themselves”. “Is there anyway to test how bespoke these orders really are?” The Problem This conversation, in various guises happens regularly with clients, and sometimes it’s true, but often, we’re not as unique as we think. And that’s a good thing! The more unique we are, or decide to be, in our operations the more expensive our journey to digitisation becomes. This becomes particularly salient against the backdrop of New Zealand’s beating heart of manufacturing SME’s being in the midst of a perpetual battle when it comes to digitisation. Firstly, weighing up the challenging costs of developing digital systems and automated processes that are fit for purpose with realistic return on investment. Whilst secondly, being touted the value of Industry 4 technologies but facing a skills barrier to adoption. The Solution So what advice would I give to any manufacturing business looking to digitisation and automation be? It’s simple. Start thinking about your internal operations differently. Or paradoxically, not different at all. Whilst there is widespread appreciation for needing a clear competitive advantage, that thing or things that set you apart and make you unique. Extending this thinking to everything about your business can hamper digital progress, driving you to look for or build bespoke solutions that match your processes perfectly. Where competitive advantage should be ‘up in lights’ externally. Internally we should be asking ourselves the question ‘how can we make this process as similar as possible to other operations’. This is for two reasons: It’s cheaper to borrow than build. If that’s the […]

«‹ 6 7 8 9 ›»

News Ticker

doug

About doug

Posts by Doug Green: