Can we be more productive?
By Ian Walsh, Managing Director, Intent Group Over the past 50 years, New Zealand has been on a negative GDP trajectory versus the OECD, sliding from 5th place to 22nd! The top 10 countries average 60% more productivity per person per capita in US$ than we do, and this gap has been widening since the mid 1980’s.* The general consensus is that we work hard, and the statistics say we work more hours than most. Clearly this is the harder not smarter argument. Perhaps Sir Paul Callaghan captured it best when he said, “In New Zealand we sense, somehow we are not as prosperous as we would like.” Without highly productive businesses we will not be able to generate the income to invest in human and physical capital, to create the society and country we aspire to. So why are we less productive? There has been a lot of research over the years, with the traditional arguments being that our costs are higher as we are further away from market. The research, however, shows that we should be 20% above the average** and playing in the top 10, but we are not. This is due to: Weak international connections. New Zealand firms face reduced access to large markets and limited participation in global value chains, where the transfer of advanced technologies now often occurs. Underinvestment in “knowledge-based capital”. In particular, R&D undertaken by the business sector is among the lowest in the OECD, reducing the capacity for “frontier innovation” and the ability of firms to absorb new ideas developed elsewhere (“technological catch-up”). The quality of management in New Zealand is low, which decreases the productivity gains from new technology. I find these outcomes interesting, but not surprising. 90% of NZ businesses are SME’s who can’t afford HR or a training manager, let alone an innovation manager! Most investment is managed by the entrepreneur who started the […]