Manufacturing Technology

The landscape of manufacturing is undergoing a significant transformation as we transition from the principles of Industry 4.0 to the emerging focus of Industry 5.0. While Industry 4.0 emphasised automation and the integration of digital technologies into manufacturing processes, Industry 5.0 shifts the spotlight towards augmentation, fostering a harmonious collaboration between humans and machines. Evolution from Industry 4.0 to 5.0  Industry 4.0 brought a revolution by embedding automation and data exchange into manufacturing through cyber-physical systems, the Internet of Things, and cloud computing. The central aim was to streamline operations, reduce human intervention, and enhance efficiency. However, as we pivot to Industry 5.0, the emphasis broadens to include the critical role humans play alongside machines, leveraging the unique capabilities of both to drive innovation and adaptability. Key Differences: Automation vs Augmentation  The shift from automation to augmentation marks a fundamental change. Automation focuses on machines performing tasks independently, effectively reducing human involvement in repetitive and labour-intensive activities. In contrast, augmentation enhances human capabilities. It is about empowering workers with intelligent systems, using machines to support and elevate human decision-making and creativity rather than replace it. Benefits of Human-Machine Collaboration  The synergy between humans and machines in Industry 5.0 offers numerous benefits. It enhances problem-solving capabilities by combining human intuition with machine precision and data processing power. This partnership can lead to more innovative solutions and a more flexible production environment. Moreover, it increases operational efficiency as machines handle repetitive tasks, allowing human workers to focus on more strategic roles that require creativity and complex decision-making. Examples of Successful Augmentation  Real-world examples of successful augmentation in manufacturing often involve collaborative robots, known as cobots, working alongside human workers on production lines. These cobots are designed to assist with precision tasks, reducing the physical strain on workers and lowering the risk of human error. […]

You might have heard the term ‘tech bro’ – a shorthand for the hypermasculine culture synonymous with the startup world. But while it’s often associated with Silicon Valley, that same culture is alive and well in New Zealand’s innovation scene too, say researchers Professor Anne de Bruin and Dr Janine Swail. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: the networks, organisations, and funding systems that support startup ventures, might seem open to all. But they’re far from gender neutral, the researchers say. “The strong association of masculine traits with entrepreneurship persists, hindering gender equity,” says de Bruin. In a new paper, de Bruin and Swail examine how gender dynamics shape startup ecosystems, and how feminist theories can be used to make them more inclusive and equitable. “If you think about Auckland’s startup sector, it’s still pretty ‘tech bro’,” says Swail. “We need to rethink what it means to be inclusive in entrepreneurship.” She says this starts with challenging the norms that shape entrepreneurial culture – norms that can make women and non-binary people feel unwelcome. “Imagine you’re a female deep-tech entrepreneur looking for a lab or an accelerator programme,” says Swail. “You walk into a space that feels overwhelmingly masculine; in-jokes, blokey language, a boys club. It can be difficult to feel like you belong, let alone thrive.” One of the biggest barriers? Unacknowledged gender bias baked into the structures and language of entrepreneurship. De Bruin points to New Zealand’s finance ecosystem, where most venture capitalists are men. “The way people communicate and operate in that world is often coded in a very masculine way. Language matters, and when we start to unpack it, we see how women and others are often excluded, even unintentionally.” If New Zealand wants to develop a genuinely diverse startup sector, we need to question who it’s built for, and who’s […]