The Circular Economy

Make your emissions data stand up to scrutiny

Starting out with your first carbon footprint, or refining years of data? Either way, the credibility of your greenhouse-gas (GHG) numbers matters. Reliable, verified information builds trust with customers, regulators and supply-chain partners – and helps you make confident decisions. Here’s how to find the right type of independent check for your business. Why independent checks matter Independent reviews give confidence that your figures are robust and transparent. For manufacturers, they can reveal data gaps in energy use, fuel consumption or process emissions; reduce the risk of overstated “carbon-neutral” claims; and strengthen credibility with clients, boards and export markets. A third-party perspective adds objectivity and helps demonstrate integrity – especially useful when bidding for contracts or supplying international brands that ask for evidence of sustainability performance. Choosing the right GHG evaluation approach Term Use for: What is reviewed (include timeframe) Outcome Verification Public reporting or disclosure where independent checks are required. Credibility for boards, investors, or regulators. Historical GHG data, calculation methods, and processes. Timeframe: Past or current reporting period. Independent statement of assurance – limited (regulatory) or reasonable (investor-grade). Validation Setting or updating emissions reduction targets. Testing future assumptions or pathways. Assumptions, models, and methods for projections. Timeframe: Future targets or scenarios. Opinion on whether your approach and assumptions are sound and achievable. External review Independent feedback before verification or disclosure. Checking inventory or scope 3 estimates. Data, methods, and reporting approach. Timeframe: Past or current data. Informal feedback to improve quality; no formal assurance. Assurance Building confidence in verified data for regulated or investor reporting. Choosing limited or reasonable assurance. Verified historical information. Timeframe: Past reporting period. Formal statement confirming confidence level in verified data. Certification Claiming carbon neutrality or joining programmes (e.g. Toitū, Ekos, Climate Active). Public recognition of verified results. Verified data, reduction plans, and […]

Beyond the roadmap: How Argus made people the engine of change

Adam Harvey, Business Performance Partner – Manufacturing, The Learning Wave Running operations today feels like living in two realities at once. On one hand, you know the plant has to modernise. The systems are creaking, customers want more for less, and digital tools promise the efficiency you need. On the other hand, you look around the floor and think: “My people aren’t ready for this.” That’s where we see so many transformations stall. The roadmap is clear, the tech is lined up, the investment made, but the people who have to use it don’t feel confident, don’t trust it, or don’t see why it matters. And then the numbers don’t move. Dashboards gather dust. Automation creates frustration. The new machine sits there like an expensive ornament. Argus chose a different path. One that not only delivered the transformation but unlocked double-digit lifts in productivity and quality along the way. Technology set the stage, people made it work After engaging LMAC to run a SIRI readiness survey, their plan was clear: invest in digital tools, shop-floor intelligence, automation, and smarter integration. Dsifer built the data backbone. Design Energy explored automation. The roadmap was solid, and the tools were lining up. The Board and GM believed in the vision, but crucially, they also believed that the only way this transformation would stick was if they first invested in their people. They knew that tech doesn’t run the factory, people do. Dashboards don’t drive performance if no one looks at them. Automation doesn’t add value if the team doesn’t trust it. New systems don’t solve problems if people are too nervous to use them. That’s why Argus called us. “We need you to work with our people and get them ready for this transformation.” We built people’s confidence so they trusted the […]

SouthMach 2025: Innovation, Excellence, and the Future Talent of New Zealand Manufacturing

From June issue, NZ Manufacturer magazine www.nzmanufacturer.co.nz -Adam Sharman,CEO LMAC Group, APAC SouthMach 2025, held at Wolfbrook Arena in Christchurch from 28–29 May, once again proved to be the South Island’s premier event for the manufacturing and engineering sectors. With a strong focus on innovation, digital transformation, and workforce development, this year’s expo came at a pivotal time for New Zealand’s manufacturing industry—one that is navigating both significant challenges and emerging opportunities. The SouthMach expo is always an opportunity to showcase the innovation happening in New Zealand and this year’s event was no exception with a focus on South Island innovation through the AMA Innovation Zone led by Dawn Aerospace, Argus Manutech, ENI Engineering and Hamilton Jet and United Machinists. It was interesting to see how these organisations have practically leveraged industry 4.0 technologies in the New Zealand context to drive innovation and productivity through smart investment and a staged approach to adoption. The adoption of Industry 4.0 was a key theme of SouthMach this year and this was reinforced through the ASB Manufacturers Workshop, delivered by the EMA and LMAC. Participants on both days were exposed to a practical case study to build awareness of industry 4.0 in a New Zealand business and left with a roadmap of next steps for their own businesses. A Visionary Keynote: From Garage to Orbit One of the most inspiring moments of SouthMach 2025 came from Charlie North of Dawn Aerospace, during his keynote titled “From Garage to Orbit: A Manufacturing Story.” North shared the company’s remarkable journey from a backyard shed in New Zealand to becoming a global leader in spaceplane and in-space propulsion technology. His talk emphasised that true innovation in manufacturing isn’t about hype or heroics—it’s about people, process, and purpose. He called on New Zealand’s industrial sector to “aim high, build well, and back […]

Have you optimised your asset care strategy?

-Ian Walsh, Partner, Argon & Co NZ It’s great to see the recent government announcements allowing additional tax deduction for new assets, which will encourage business to invest in plants and equipment to help drive productivity. These are all a step in the right direction for making New Zealand’s manufacturing sector more competitive on a global stage. With that said, any investment should be reviewed in terms of the cost and benefit, and the overall business case for making it. When I worked in Japan the approach taken was to drive efficiency and productivity until you had exhausted the potential of your existing assets. The aim was to get the absolute maximum possible out of all the equipment and space available, and only then to invest in extra capacity. This led to a relentless focus on efficiency and debottlenecking to get the most reliable, most productive assets. I remember a conversation I had with a production manager at one of these Japanese plants. He explained to me how he disliked new equipment, as “the first day was the worst day”, and it got better after that. He preferred older equipment because “we know everything about it and how to run it highly efficiently”. This is interesting to compare with more ‘Western’ approaches where we assume that new equipment is at its best on its first day and then we depreciate it, because it’s deteriorating and will only perform worse from then! The difference is that the better performing factories don’t only invest in new capital when they need capacity (or to meet an innovation need); they invest in the total asset. This includes how it is commissioned, optimising it for its role, how it is run, how it’s maintained, care for its individual parts, how people are trained to operate […]

Remanufacturing 101: Reviving parts, reclaiming value

The remanufacturing market unlocks opportunity across sectors for higher margins, affordability, and supply chain resilience. Remanufacturing, the process of restoring used parts to give them a second life, has propelled into the spotlight in recent years by attempts to mitigate supply chain shortages, reach new customers through affordability, and search for high-margin alternatives for parts. Both independent remanufacturing companies and remanufacturing arms within OEMs have proved essential for efficiently restoring parts and creating a way to lower expenses while making operations more efficient. These players provide value across multiple industries, from the well-established space in the automotive sector to more emergent opportunities across sectors such as medical devices and electronics. All of these sectors can benefit from reduced dependence on raw materials, extended product life cycles, and more. But remanufacturing is an inherently complex process, and the industry faces unique challenges. For example, remanufacturers grapple with the unpredictable availability, quantity, and quality of incoming used parts (referred to as “core”), complex pricing due to the volume and long tail of SKUs, and a high volume of unstructured, text-based data generated by product warranty claims. What is remanufacturing? Remanufacturing is the process of restoring core to give it an entirely new life. The core, the starting point for the remanufacturing process, is typically a high-value part that requires technical expertise to be restored to its original function. Within the automotive and industrials industry, parts that can be remanufactured include engines, transmissions, hydraulic components (such as bucket lifters), and drivetrain components (such as clutches and axels), as well as turbochargers and superchargers. Historically, the automotive and industrial equipment industries have had the most use cases for remanufacturing, but a growing number of use cases are emerging in industries such as medical devices, furniture, electronics, and aircraft components. The remanufacturing process typically involves seven […]

Sustainability Outlook 2025: Six tips for manufacturers

www.thinkstep-anz.com From February issue NZ Manufacturer magazine Sustainability is no longer a “nice-to-have”—it’s a must-have. For New Zealand manufacturers, 2025 will bring new challenges and exciting opportunities. As the world grapples with climate change, resource scarcity, and shifting regulations, businesses that embrace sustainability will not only keep up but thrive. To stay competitive, manufacturers need to navigate changes in climate adaptation, the circular economy, transparency, and stakeholder expectations. It’s about planning ahead, staying flexible, and taking action. Here are six practical tips from thinkstep-anz’s sustainability experts to help you lead the way in 2025. Stay financially, environmentally and socially sustainable 2025 is expected to bring continued disruption and uncertainty on the global stage. Political and economic turbulence may distract some industries from their sustainability goals. However, maintaining focus on long-term objectives is critical. “Succeeding sustainably means being financially sustainable as well as environmentally and socially,” explains Emily Townsend, Services Director at thinkstep-anz. For manufacturers, this means building resilience by investing in sustainable practices that match up with stakeholder priorities and market expectations. Even if external pressures temporarily lessen, pushing forward with sustainability can pay dividends in the long run. Your Action: Review your sustainability strategy to ensure it balances environmental goals with financial and social resilience. Focus on initiatives that will have long-term benefits for your business and stakeholders. Prepare for the circular economy to go mainstream The circular economy is no longer a niche concept. In 2025, manufacturers exporting to the EU will face increasing requirements to quantify and communicate the circularity of their products. Aligning with standards like ISO 59020 and incorporating circularity metrics into Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) will become essential to maintaining market access. “We’ll see the circular economy go mainstream,” predicts Jim Goddin, Head of Circular Economy at thinkstep-anz. This trend is also gaining traction […]

How manufacturers can prepare for the ESPR

www.thinkstep-anz.com Image by Dinh Khoi Nguyen from Pixabay. As global sustainability regulations evolve, New Zealand manufacturers must stay ahead of the curve to maintain their competitive edge, especially with upcoming policies like the European Union’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). But what is the ESPR, and how can manufacturers in New Zealand prepare for it? What is the ESPR? The ESPR is a new EU policy aimed at making products more sustainable and circular throughout their lifecycle, supporting the EU’s 2050 climate goals. The ESPR applies to products sold within the EU, setting specific sustainability requirements for design, use and disposal. It applies to most products sold in the EU, except for some like food and medicines. Non-compliant products may face fines or bans. Although it took effect in July 2024, the detailed rules will be developed over the next year. The regulation aims to make products more durable, reusable, repairable, and recyclable, while banning the destruction of unsold goods like electronics and textiles. A digital product passport will also be required, giving consumers direct access to sustainability data and exposing brands to greenwashing claims under the Green Claims Directive. Why should New Zealand manufacturers pay attention to ESPR? For manufacturers exporting to the EU or intend to: Failure to prepare for the regulations could result in loss of market access, fines, or even prosecution. Your products will face stricter comparisons on sustainability and circularity, which could impact your market share positively or negatively. Even if your business doesn’t currently export to the EU, the trends set by the ESPR are likely to influence regulations and purchasing decisions in other markets. As supply chains globalise, multinational corporations may enforce ESPR-style standards on all their suppliers, no matter where they are located. With more sustainability and […]

Ten tips to make your business case for sustainability stack up

This information is based on a guide we wrote with the Sustainable Business Council and Kaitiaki Collective. It’s a situation we know many manufacturers face. You want to make your business more sustainable. (Bravo!) You can see the many benefits of manufacturing products that reuse resources, avoid modern slavery and create fewer environmental impacts. But – here’s the kicker – you’re struggling to get the business case for making these changes ‘over the line’ with your accountant or finance team. These ten tips will help you. Tip 1. See becoming more sustainable as an investment Sustainable businesses are excellent businesses. They create value in the short and long terms – economically, environmentally and socially. Treat your sustainability programme as an investment and manage it as one. Tip 2. Identify your stakeholders Consider the many people who have a ‘stake’ in your business succeeding sustainably. You will naturally think of your investors, customers, suppliers, team, local community and regulators. Think longer term and wider too. Include the environment and people who will live many years in the future. Tip 3. Confirm where to focus with a materiality assessment Your business case needs to reflect the views of all these stakeholders and your business too. Start with a ‘materiality assessment’. It’s a practical way, using interviews and surveys, to home in on the sustainability activities that your stakeholders and business care about and to prioritise the ones that matter most. A materiality assessment takes a broad view of sustainability and covers environmental, social and economic topics. Include your top priority topics in your business case. Tip 4. Understand who you need to convince Who do you need to influence to get your business case over the line? What are they interested in? What are they concerned about? Who else has their ear? […]

Systems thinking and sustainable manufacturing

Remember the moment your flatpack furniture finally took shape (with no pieces missing and your relationships intact)? The last piece slotted in because you got the ‘system’ right. Assorted pieces came together, in the right way, to make a useful item of furniture that was ‘more than the sum of its parts’. Sustainability is about systems too. Understanding the relationships between a strong bottom line, a flourishing environment and thriving people and communities will help you make your manufacturing business more sustainable. In fact, you can’t have a healthy business if you don’t attend to all parts of the system. In this article, we look at systems in your manufacturing business. Drawing on examples from our 2023 articles, we show the opportunities these systems offer to become more sustainable. But first, some background. Systems in sustainability The United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals are a good place to start. They highlight the social, economic and environmental systems that make up our world, plus the links between them. These systems reinforce one another. Some systems are virtuous. Get one thing right and we fix others too. For example, if we consume and produce responsibly (SDG12), we reduce carbon emissions (SDG 13) and modern slavery (positive impacts on social SDGs 1, 5 and 8). Vicious cycles are possible too. If we plant soybeans to create renewable bio-diesel (SDG 7), we risk crowding out native plants (SDG15). Systems in manufacturing As a manufacturer you’re familiar with ‘systems thinking’, even if you don’t call it this. That’s because your business is a system. For example, when raw materials are unavailable, your production line slows down. You have to re-plan your team’s rosters, your production run, marketing schedule, deliveries and cashflow. Everything’s linked. Here are some other examples of systems in your business and what […]

A straddle carrier moving through the container stacks

NZ-EU trade agreement is great news for sustainability

It’s been a long time coming! In July, New Zealand signed a free trade agreement (FTA) with the European Union. Good news for manufacturers too. New Zealand’s exports of goods to its fourth largest trading partner were worth NZD4.68b in 2022. These goods included many manufactured products – machinery, medical appliances, food products, plastics, aluminium and others. More than 91% of New Zealand’s trade into the EU will enter duty-free when the FTA comes into force (expected to be in the first half of 2024). Many goods, including some manufactured products, will have no tariffs at all from this date. This means many millions of dollars of tariff savings each year on exports to the EU. After seven years, when the agreement is fully in place, 97% of current trade will enter the EU duty-free. How the new FTA promotes sustainability The FTA will make trade more sustainable and create opportunities for businesses that deliver more sustainable products. The agreement is the first FTA built around the EU’s ’Together for Green and Just Growth’ approach to trade and sustainable development. It contains ambitious sustainable trade outcomes in many areas. Environmental outcomes include addressing climate change and subsidies on fossil fuel. Social outcomes include promoting labour rights and women’s economic empowerment. The upside for manufacturers – and some warnings The FTA will have a big impact on trade between New Zealand and the EU. The potential upside for local manufacturers is significant: easier access to one of the world’s most lucrative trading blocs; lower costs for materials imported from the EU. However, the FTA comes with warnings too. Firstly, local manufacturers will be competing with EU manufacturers who may have been making their products more sustainable for some years. As customers here and in the EU prioritise ‘responsible purchasing’, make sure […]

1 2 3 4

News Ticker

The Circular Economy