Modern workplaces need fit for purpose legislation
– Leeann Watson , Chief Executive, Canterbury Employers’ Chamber of Commerce Parliament’s Education and Workforce Select Committee has now completed its hearings on the Government’s Employment Relations Amendment Bill. Hopefully, the Committee will take on-board the strong feedback from the business community that any legislative changes need to be fit for modern workplaces and a high performing economy, and not based on failed approaches from the Seventies. The Government has stated that is aspires to create a high wage, high productivity economy, a goal that we all strongly support. However, I am concerned that this Bill will not deliver those goals. Four aspects of the Bill are especially worrying: Employers with 20 employees or more will lose the right to include trial periods in employment agreements. Trial periods have given many employers the confidence to take on people without experience. 80% of employers used a 90-day trial period in the last year. This clause will discourage New Zealand’s larger employers from doing this and make it harder for young and inexperienced people to enter the workforce. Allowing union reps access to workplaces without any permission. This caused issues in the past. Thankfully, employers and unions today have mutually respectful relationships, and we expect most unions would still provide notice regardless of legislation. So why return the country to an “us-vs-them”, anti-growth mentality from the 70s? Forcing businesses to settle collective agreements even if they don’t or can’t agree. The right for either party to opt out of the bargaining process is fair and equitable. Removing this right from employers creates an uneven playing field, which is not only unfair but also a recipe for bad agreements created under duress. Not allowing businesses a choice to opt out of a multi-employer collective agreement. This compels businesses to join […]