Business News

The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), the Sustainable Business Council and Deloitte today launched the CDP Australia and New Zealand Climate Change Report, which analyses how NZX 50 and ASX 200 businesses are tackling climate change.  This CDP report, written by Deloitte on behalf of 655 institutional investors representing US$78 trillion in assets, provides an annual update on greenhouse gas emissions data and climate change strategies at the largest listed companies in NZ and Australia.  A key finding is that New Zealand companies are falling behind and need to improve their climate change disclosure if they are to satisfy their investors and customers. The average carbon disclosure score for NZX 50 companies fell from 49 in 2011 to 47 last year, well below the average scores of their international peers in countries like Australia (ASX 200 – 65), UK (FTSE 350 – 66), and the USA (S&P 500 – 70). Disclosure scores below 50 are considered to be low quality, while score of 50-70 are mid-range and 70+ high quality. The maximum possible carbon disclosure score is 100. Over 4,000 companies globally disclosed climate change information through CDP in 2012. This includes over 80% of the 500 largest listed companies in the world, and over 2,000 suppliers. According to a recent GlobeScan and SustainAbility survey of 850 sustainability professionals in 70 countries, CDP is considered the most credible corporate sustainability ranking.  The report also recognises five NZX 50 companies on the CDP NZX 50 Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index for the high quality of their carbon disclosure. These companies are: ANZ Banking Corporation, Telstra Corporation, Westpac Banking Corporation, Fletcher Building and AMP.  Air New Zealand, Telstra and Sky Network TV all significantly increased their carbon disclosure scores this year.   Westpac was also recognised for its high carbon performance, and is the […]

Positive indications from some companies today that they are prepared to work towards a living wage of $18 with and for their staff. Even though it might take a couple of years to get to that amount at least its a step in the right direction. The companies are working on their own initiative to make this happen, choosing this as against the financial change coming in through government legislation. It is a great initiative but shameful that government is not proactively bringing this change about for its citizens. How does this affect your company? Are you prepared (or able) to increase the wages of your staff without placing too much stress on your operations? Or will you need to lift the price of goods or raw components to make this a reality? We’d love to hear from you. -Doug Green

New Zealand’s manufacturing sector started 2013 with an encouraging result, according to the latest BNZ – BusinessNZ Performance of Manufacturing Index (PMI). The seasonally adjusted PMI for January was 55.2 (a PMI reading above 50.0 indicates that manufacturing is generally expanding; below 50.0 that it is declining). This was 4.8 points up from December and the highest result since May 2012. Compared with previous January results, this was the highest since 2007. BusinessNZ’s executive director for manufacturing Catherine Beard said that the January result was heartening, and in various respects reflected the nuances of New Zealand’s manufacturing sector at present. “Recent headlines have concentrated on various job losses in the sector. This is also reflected in our employment index, which has remained in contraction for eight consecutive months. However, what we are seeing with the broader results is that job losses do not equate with overall declines in activity, as three of the last four months have shown growth in the sector. Also, a healthy lift in new orders for January, along with continued recovery work in the Canterbury region, should assist production levels in the months ahead.   However, what we are seeing with the broader results is that job losses do not equate with overall declines in activity “Obviously, it is too early to provide any indication whether 2013 looks set to be a better year for New Zealand manufacturers than 2012. However, looking more broadly, the JPMorgan Global Manufacturing PMI was at a ten month high in January, with expectations that this may strengthen further in the next few months. BNZ Economist Doug Steel said, ‘While positivity seems to be increasing among those associated with the much anticipated lift in domestic construction activity, there was growing anxiety among those that supply the slowing Australian economy. Still, overall, it […]

The Climate Control Companies Association (CCCA), representing New Zealand’s refrigeration, heating, ventilation and air conditioning sub-contractors, hasexpressed its dismay over Mainzeal’s receivership and backed calls by other industry groups to improve security of payments for subcontractors. Although the Construction Contracts Act clarifies the process for claims and subsequent adjudication, it does not extend to explicitly protecting retentions held back from sub-contractor payments – essentially providing interest-free loans to prime contractors. Prime contractors will often retain 10 percent of a contract value for up to two years, arguing they are necessary to enforce performance or complete remedial work.  “The announcement of Mainzeal’s financial meltdown on Waitangi Day highlights again the vulnerability of sub-contractors to the knock on effect of a major builder going bust,” says Rob Morgan, Chairperson, CCCA. “New Zealand cannot afford to lose the specialist skills and trades represented by our members, and those sub-contractors in other industries – who will now carry the can for Mainzeal’s losses.” “We believe it is now time to review security of payments of retentions, and identify cross-industry alternatives, potentially such as an escrow or trust, to ensure sub-contractors interests are protected. Subcontractor retentions are ineffective, add hidden costs on projects and actually increase the financial fallout from failure of contractors.” The CCCA Board is waiting for further news from PwC and in the meantime intends surveying members to ascertain the full extent of the industry’s exposure.    

Accelerating successful commercialisation of innovation in New Zealand firms is the yardstick by which Callaghan Innovation will be measured, says the Chair of the newly established Crown entity, Sue Suckling. “There is great potential in the high value manufacturing sector and Callaghan Innovation’s role is to help firms grow through greater application of science, engineering and technology based innovation,” Ms Suckling said.  “Ultimately our success will be based on the success of others. Our reputation will be earned by creating opportunities and revenue, for firms in the manufacturing sector as well as organisations in the science, engineering and technology sector.”  Callaghan Innovation legally came into being today. It is named after the late Sir Paul Callaghan, one of New Zealand’s top scientists who was committed to the role innovation must play to unlock New Zealand’s potential. From today, Callaghan Innovation will incorporate former Crown Research Institute IRL and the government’s R&D grants schemes transferring from MBIE. The Auckland Foodbowl research facility and NZTE’s Better by Lean Programme will go into Callaghan Innovation in coming months. “Today is the start for the new organisation. We will be focussed on integrating and shaping the parts coming into the new organisation. More than that, we now start refining and validating the new services and support we will start to roll out later in the year. “This work will result in something tangibly different from what we had before, including services to help firms navigate the science, engineering and technology system and easily access providers to help them with their business opportunities and challenges.” “It will encompass, for example, working with customers, industry, providers and government to develop platforms for competitive advantage including, in the first instance, food and beverages, medical devices and advanced materials.” “Perhaps most importantly, the new organisation will be looking […]

Picture: Gordon Sutherland, A W Fraser. -Doug Green Opposition parties have commenced a series of meetings with the country’s manufacturers with an eye to a better future. Difficult conditions are affecting New Zealand’s manufacturers brought about in part by the high exchange rate. It’s an obvious one. I know through my meetings and conversations with manufacturers around the country that this is one of the key concerns for their viability, indeed for the future of their company. I don’t know how much communication I have had from John Walley of the New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association on this point. Indeed, his frustration has been (almost) toxic at times because he points out what we all know – the exchange rate effects our companies too much in today’s market and something has to be done about it. NZMEA gathered key people together for these meetings and are to be commended on doing so. A participant and also contributor to this issue of NZ Manufacturer, Gordon Sutherland of A W Fraser says “The prevailing view from the media and government is that we cannot do anything about the exchange rate, in fact it almost seems as if the government are willing to sacrifice exporters just to keep to the long held view that the reserve bank act and its ensuing monetary policy is sacrosanct. “As the dollar climbs, we often hear in the media and from, in my view uninformed parties ask, “Why don’t exporters just put their price up?” “It sounds like a beautifully simple solution; as the exchange rate goes up, put your price up. Unfortunately this view outlines a very poor understanding of basic business practice. “As an exporter, if our product is being shipped to and sold in the US, we are competing with local US manufacturer’s, […]

The latest New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association (NZMEA) Survey of Business Conditions completed during January 2013, shows total sales in December 2012 decreased 5.35% (export sales decreased by 3.83% with domestic sales decreasing 6.62%) on December 2011. The NZMEA survey sample this month covered NZ$556m in annualised sales, with an export content of 46%. Net confidence fell to -14, down from the  result reported last month.  The current performance index (a combination of profitability and cash flow) is at 101, down from 104.5 in November, the change index (capacity utilisation, staff levels, orders and inventories) went down to 97 from 102 in the last survey, and the forecast index (investment, sales, profitability and staff) is at 101.75, down on November’s result of 104. Anything less than 100 indicates a contraction.  Constraints reported were 86% markets, 7% skilled staff and 7% production. Staff numbers for December increased year on year by 1.89%. “2012 ended on a negative note, both domestic and export sales fell year on year,” says NZMEA Chief Executive John Walley. “Confidence fell, after a bit of a recovery in November. This is largely due the ever higher exchange rate. At the same time we see decreases on our composite indexes.” “There is not really a lot of good news about at the moment, markets are soft and margins are squeezed by the exchange rate.” “The Reserve Bank yet again chose to keep interest rates at 2.5%, despite the recognition that the dollar is overvalued. This is disappointing, as the recent low inflationary pressures have left room for a cut to boost growth and counteract some of the exchange rate appreciation. Their main concern, as always, was a house price bubble, but bereft of any supplementary instruments interest rates cannot do it all. Mutterings from the RBNZ on […]

The New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association (NZMEA) welcome the announced changes to the apprenticeship scheme, particularly the merging of the Modern Apprenticeship fund into one scheme and the increase in funding. “It’s simple, easy to understand, administer, and supports all apprentices regardless of age,” says Peter Herbert, Executive member of the NZMEA and Chair of Apprentice Training New Zealand (ATNZ).  “This, along with the increased funding, demonstrates greater Government commitment to the apprenticeship system which is essential for the manufacturing and exporting community.”  “Those of us in industry understand the need for skilled tradesmen and technicians to drive our industries into the future. We are competing in highly specialised markets which require innovation and skill – in other words, a highly skilled, highly competent workforce,” says Mr Herbert. “It is a four-year commitment for most companies taking on an apprentice and the incentive offered by Government makes the decision that little bit easier,” says Mr Herbert. Apprentice Training New Zealand Trust (ATNZ) is New Zealand’s largest employer of mechanical engineering apprentices, currently employing around 350 apprentices, which it seconds to engineering and manufacturing companies throughout New Zealand.    

The failure to make a firm recommendation on the mutual recognition of imputation tax credits clouds the value elsewhere in the joint report, Strengthening Trans-Tasman Economic Relations, just released by the Productivity Commissions of New Zealand and Australia. The Employers and Manufacturers Association says the failure not to come out strongly in favour of mutual recognition of the tax credits suggests, despite all the analysis put up to the contrary, that at least $300 million of benefit to our trans Tasman economies is not important.  “The Productivity Commissions shy off from the single most significant impediment to the development of CER,” said Kim Campbell, EMA’s chief executive.  “Mutual recognition of tax credits is by far the most important outstanding issue,” Mr Campbell said.  “At stake is New Zealand’s very ability to build and retain world scale companies head quartered here. “So long as the issue remains unresolved, the risk is their head offices will always migrate to Australia.  “Under the present regime, when the success of a New Zealand company means it attracts more shareholders in Australia than here, then those shareholders will always oblige the company to transfer its head office to Australia.  “There have been several high profile examples of this modern day economic colonialism; the Australian government is reluctant to act on it because Australia is benefiting from the value created by New Zealanders. “It’s extremely disturbing, and we urge our Prime Minister to redouble New Zealand’s efforts to resolve it. “Continuing the present arrangement also reduces the returns that Australian businesses with operations in New Zealand can achieve. “It’s a pity the Productivity Commissions didn’t take into account these longer term implications in their economic analysis as other recommendations in the report are most worthwhile. “For example the concept of a trans Tasman visa where people […]

The service sector continues to see its level of expansion slip lower, according to the BNZ – BusinessNZ Performance of Services Index (PSI). The PSI for December was 51.5. This was down 2.7 points from November, following a 3.6 fall from October (A PSI reading above 50.0 indicates that the service sector is generally expanding; below 50.0 that it is declining). Over 2012, the PSI has averaged 53.8, with all but one month (August) in expansion. Compared to previous December results, the 2012 value was almost identical with 2011. BusinessNZ chief executive Phil O’Reilly said that 2012 had been mostly positive for the service sector, although the second half of the year provided mixed results.  “When comparing the PSI with its sister survey the PMI, the service sector has held up despite another difficult trading year. However, 2012 has ended with more of a whimper than a bang as new activity/sales slowed and employment remained lacklustre.  “Globally, the service sector has shown incremental improvements over the latter half of 2012, which should bode well for on-going growth trends in 2013. Whether we see this uplift in New Zealand remains to be seen, given the domestic PSI has shown patchy growth for a number of months.” BNZ senior economist Craig Ebert says the most positive message to take from the December results is in the jobs growth area. “The PSI staffing index is decently above the line. When combined with other pointers to jobs across the economy, we have good reason to believe employment growth is in the throes of picking up, perhaps to as much as 2% for 2013 as a whole. This would amount to an addition of about 45,000 jobs.” The seasonally adjusted BNZ – BusinessNZ Performance of Composite Index or PCI (which combines the PMI and PSI) […]