A more useful model of tertiary education
By Dieter Adam, CEO of the NZMEA Education is key to ensuring our people will be the best they can be and creating the most productive, capable and innovative economy we can. Human capital is just as important as any other input in a manufacturing business; if not the most important one. However, current research suggests that our return on investment in the tertiary sector is low compared to other OECD countries. Anecdotally, many businesses feel the reality of this when they have trouble filling skilled positions, and at times have to look overseas to find skills that just are not being delivered by the current system. The Productivity Commission is now looking into this problem and how new models of tertiary education could provide better outcomes. Generally, discussions about tertiary education can be dominated by established views and self-serving PR – it is great to see the Productivity Commission undertake a wide and data-driven examination. A root cause of the problems in our tertiary sector lies in its overarching focus on quantity over quality, ‘bums on seats’, in large part due to the funding policies that reward maximising the number of students enrolled, independent of what and how these students are doing. There is also a drive towards enrolling international students, which brings income to the institution and export revenue to the country, but can be driven by offering courses that attract large numbers of students and not necessarily what we need to grow our economy. Forecasts for domestic student numbers show a drop due to demographic factors. It is no coincidence that we currently hear a lot about the financial benefits of a university education, without real consideration for other options that may have better career pathways and opportunities, such as Polytech, trades or apprenticeship education. Many people will be […]